Functional Assessment Scales in a General Intensive Care Unit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2015/hc.v8i4.552Keywords:
functional ability, disability, impairment, scales, functional assessment, intensive care unitAbstract
The aims of this study were to describe the functional assessment scales for intensive care unit patients, to examine the psychometric evidence for reliability and validity and to summarize the strengths and the weaknesses of them. Several instruments have been used so far for the assessment of functional ability, impairment and/or disability in ICU patients, but all of them have specific limitations. These measurement tools include: Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure, Functional Status Score for the ICU, Physical Function ICU Test Modified Rankin Scale, Karnofsky Scale Index, 4P questionnaire, Glasgow Outcome Scale, and Disability Rating Scale. The choice of the most appropriate assessment tool will depend on the specific patient population, its diagnosis and rehabilitation phase and the psychological properties of the available measurement. Future studies should examine additional types of reliability and validity with more sophisticated statistical analyses and to assess whether the tool is used for research and/or for clinical purposes.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).