Comparing Novel Positron Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Conventional Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2015/hc.v7i3.477Keywords:
single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, myocardial perfusion imaging, coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia, myocardial viabilityAbstract
For myocardial blood flow imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) technology is widely accepted by the cardiological community. It is supported by rich literature and has acceptable diagnostic accuracy. However it does have limitations with false positive studies especially in women and obese patients and underestimates the multivessel coronary disease. Positron emission tomography (PET) technology appears to be able to improve diagnostic accuracy in detecting coronary disease. It offers qualitatively better images with shorter acquisition times and lower radiation burden on patients and personnel. It has the advantage of absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow for multivessel coronary disease diagnosis and is superior in the assessment of myocardial viability. In absolute terms it is an expensive method but avoiding the cost of additional diagnostic tests in equivocal studies makes it cost effective. Its availability is improving and it is expected to help in advancing nuclear cardiology.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).