Renal Angioplasty and Stenting: is it Still Indicated After ASTRAL and STAR Studies?

Authors

  • Michel Henry, et al Cabinet de Cardiologie 80, rue Raymond Poincaré 54000 NANCY, FRANCE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2015/hc.v7i1%20Sup.450

Keywords:

renal artery angioplasty, renal artery stenting, refractory hypertension

Abstract

A renal artery stenosis (RAS) is common among patients with atherosclerosis, up to a third of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Fibromuscular dysplasia is the next cause of RAS, commonly found in young women. Atherosclerosis RAS generally progresses overtime and is often associated with loss of renal mass and worsening renal function (RF). Percutaneous renal artery stent placement is the preferred method of revascularization for hemodynamically significant RAS according to ACC and AHA guidelines. Several randomized trials have shown the superiority of endovascular procedures to medical therapy alone. However, 2 studies ASTRAL and STAR studies were recently published and did not find any difference between renal stenting and medical therapy. But these studies have a lot of limitations and flaws as we will discuss. (poor indications, poor results, numerous complications, failures, poor technique, inexperienced operators .…)

Author Biography

Michel Henry, et al, Cabinet de Cardiologie 80, rue Raymond Poincaré 54000 NANCY, FRANCE

Cardiology / Peripheral Vascular Disease

Published

2012-04-01

Issue

Section

ATHENS CARDIOLOGY UPDATE 2012