Challenges and Caveats for Stents of New Technology /Are all the Drug- Eluting Coronary Stents the Same?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2015/hc.v5i1%20Sup.363Abstract
The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) has improved the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), by addressing the issue of neointimal proliferation, a pathology contributing to restenosis. First-generation stents eluting sirolimus or paclitaxel were joined by second-generation stents, such as the everolimus- and the zotarolimus- eluting stents promising increased safety and efficacy. As a result, there is a plethora of DES available, with differences in the stent platform, the polymer coating and the eluted drug, which translate into differences in biological markers of efficacy, such as lumen late loss. However, it remains controversial whether these discrepancies have an impact on clinical markers of safety and efficacy, or if the improved efficacy of DES is a “class effect”. This article reviews the differences between drug-eluting stents by looking into the biological differences as well as into trials and registries of drug-eluting stents.Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).