Revascularization of the Infarct-Related Artery: Never Too Late?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2015/hc.v4i1.316Abstract
During the early phase of an acute myocardial infarction (MI), current consensus is that reperfusion of the infarct-related artery (IRA) should be implemented as soon as possible, more effectively accomplished via percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The clinical approach to the occluded IRA late after MI remains controversial, but current practice shows a strong trend in favour of PCI, which is based on the late open artery hypothesis. However, late PCI on IRAs also has the potential for harm from procedure-related complications. An attempt is made herein to critically overview the current data on this important topic, mainly based on recent meta-analyses with somewhat diverging results, indicating that clinical judgment and an individualized approach still remains a valid guide.Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
